Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home



Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cicalese, L.
Right arrow Articles by Benedetti, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Graft, Vol. 4, No. 8, 526-534 (2001)
© 2001 SAGE Publications

Living Related Small Bowel Transplantation

Luca Cicalese

Pierpaolo Sileri

Cristiana Rastellini

Herand Abcarian

Enrico Benedetti

Intestinal transplantation recently became a valid therapeutic option for patients with irreversible intestinal failure. The vast majority of the intestinal transplants have been performed using whole intestinal grafts obtained from cadaveric donors, and fewer than 10% have been performed using segmental grafts obtained from living related donors. Intestinal living donation offers several advantages, such as minimized preservation injury, eliminating waiting time, optimal donor quality and better HLA matching and possibly reduced incidence of rejection, lower immunosuppression and side effects, possibility to decontaminate the graft prior to transplantation, and possibly reduced risk of infectious complications. In the last few years, a standardized technique has been proposed for living related small bowel transplantation (LR-SBTx). Utilizing such a technique, the authors performed a series of LR-SBTx in their center and evaluated these potential advantages. In this review, the authors summarize the worldwide experience with LR-SBTx, including their own.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles: (Search Google Scholar for Other Citing Articles)

Home page
GutHome page
L Genton, C A Raguso, T Berney, D B Hans, P Morel, and C Pichard
Four year nutritional follow up after living related small bowel transplantation between monozygotic twins
Gut, May 1, 2003; 52(5): 659 - 662.
[Abstract] [Full Text]